With just 3 days remaining in George Bush's Presidency, he has issued a sweeping Presidential Executive Order which just may help those of us who have been trying to spread the word to have Barack Obama, aka Barack Obama II, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama removed from office. It is indeed quite unusual for a President to issue such a sweeping directive with just seventy two hours remaining as President. And yet, this Executive Order just might be instrumental in exposing President Elect Obama and might assist in criminal prosecution against him and others as well. I am not saying that is why the directive was issued- but this directive has already been instrumental in a Federal Lawsuit having been filed on January 19th, one day before the Inaugurual event.
The link to the Presidential Executive Order- direct from the White House is: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2009/01/20090116-1.html
The best link covering the lawsuit that was just filed today- and the full text of the suit filed by Dr. Orly Taitz is :http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=2965
I must admit, with all the controversy about the mystery surrounding Obama's "natural born citizen" status, I find it fascinating that such a sweeping Presidential Executive Order would be issued that might be used against Obama. I must admit I did not think George Bush had any fight left in him, but if this in any way will expose the truth behind this President Elect- then so be it.
By the way, I would like to thank the person behind http://americamustknow.com
for doing the research that saved me a great deal of trouble. There has been alot of bantering on many discussion groups about our definition of a "natural born citizen" vs just a citizen, a native born citizen or a naturalized citizen. The framers of our Constitution knew quite well what was considered a "natural born citizen" as opposed to just a native born citizen or even a citizen.
Emmerich de Vattel authored a famous publication in 1758 (just about 20 years before our Constitution) entitled "The Laws of Nations". This publication had a profound impact on the our Founding Fathers. Vattel had a full section regarding the issue and description of the term "natural born citizen" in his book. Obviously our founding fathers would have been quite familiar with this understanding which is why they inserted this requirement in Article II of our Constitution. Outside of the general context of why our founders would have cared, and short of their understanding and use of the term "natural born citizen" we might be confused as to the real meaning of the term "natural born citizen."
Allow me to quote a section of Vattel's 1758 publication "The Law of Nations" and Vattel's definition and explanation of "natural born citizen" - again with acknowledgement to my friend at "http://americamustknow.com"
"The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."
The founders knew- a natural born citizen had to be born on U.S. soil by U.S. citizens. Obama "may" (we have no proof) have been born on U.S. soil- but his father was a British Citizen - and his mother was not old enough to confer citizenship- Obama is NOT a natural born citizen! He was born subject to the British Crown- the exact scenario the founders of our Constitution shed blood to keep from happening! Just imagine, who would have thought that two hundred years after these men fought the British to free us from British rule and then having put clearly in our Constitution- NO Brit's can be elected President- or for that matter - no one who is born with dual citizenship, that we would elect a President that was born a son of a British citizen? It is a sickening kind of irony.
This should be the final word on the chapter. It is a matter of hours before a Usurper is to be Inaugurated President- while there are numerous lawsuits requesting that this be delayed until this man can prove he is a natural born citizen.
Our leaders, judges and elected officials have betrayed our Country. May God have mercy on us as we usher in a new era of lawlessness at the highest levels in the land.
Monday, January 19, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I wanted to take a look at that executive order, but I can't find it---the page has been moved/changed. Do you know where I could find it now?
Thanks!
Rosemary
Rosemary, within minutes of Obama's inauguration, they pulled the entire section on George Bush's January 16 Executive Order. I did not download it as I thought it would be here for a while. Here is an excerpt of the Executive Order complements of "therightsideoflife". Dr. Orly Taitz referred to it in her lawsuit filed against Obama on January 16th.
8. January 16, 2009, President George W. Bush enacted an Executive Order providing for, in part, “Reinvestigating Individuals in Positions of Public Trust.” The Order in its entirety is attached hereto for reference as Exhibit “A.”
9. The Order provides in pertinent part that, “It is necessary to reinvestigate individuals in positions of public trust in order to ensure that they remain suitable for continued employment.”
10. The Order further provides in pertinent part:
“Sec. 5. Reinvestigation of Individuals in Positions of Public Trust. Individuals in positions of public trust shall be subject to reinvestigation under standards (including but not limited to the frequency of such reinvestigation) as determined by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, to ensure their suitability for continued employment.
“Sec. 6. Responsibilities. (a) An agency shall report to the Office of Personnel Management the nature and results of the background investigation and fitness determination (or later changes to that determination) made on an individual, to the extent consistent with law.
“(b) The Director of the Office of Personnel Management is delegated authority to implement this order, including the authority to issue regulations and guidance governing suitability, or guidance related to fitness, as the Director determines appropriate.”
11. Article II, Section I of the United States Constitution, states, in pertinent part, as follows:
“No Person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;”
12. Title 18 Section 1001, United States Code provides in part:
“Sec. 1001. Statements or entries generally
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any
matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or
judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and
willfully–
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or
device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent
statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same
to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement
or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if
the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in
section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter
relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section
1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be
not more than 8 years.”
13. 3 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 8 provides, “The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.”
14. Constitution Article VI of the Constitution of the United States, at paragraph 2 establishes: “The Constitution . . . . shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby . . .”, preserving the inviolability of Constitution codified in Magna Carta (1215) Sect. 61. The Constitution grants all powers necessary to enforce its inviolability.
15. The right of petition for redress of grievances, securing the Constitution, guarantees each person standing to preserve the inviolability of the Constitution, as preserved in the U.S. Constitution Amendment I, in the Bill of Rights (1689), and as codified in Magna Carta (1215) Sect. 61.
Post a Comment