It has now been ten days since America held its first illegal inauguration of a U.S. President. We have now fallen victim to the greatest fraud in American history. The Congress, the previous Vice President, the United States Supreme Court, many Federal Judges, many Secretaries of State, the Democratic National Committee, and the mainstream media have all materially assisted in perpetrating this fraud on the American people.
Now some naysayers have attempted to dismiss this as mere Internet spread conspiracy and rumor, but the fact remains that Internet rumors do not end up in over 25 courtrooms throughout the United States and several cases presented to the U.S. Supreme Court. I seriously doubt if Obama had only considered these suits as non-sense, he would not have hired the Chief Counsel for the Counsel on American and Islamic Relations to defend these lawsuits. Joseph Sandler his email is: sandler@sandlerreiff.com. The firm he represents is: http://www.sandlerreiff.com/
Fortunately, there are hundreds of thousands of Americans who have learned that Obama is a fraud, the election is a fraud ,and Congress has actually acted in a reckless manner in violation of the U.S. Code and Article II of our Constitution. WorldNet Daily has just released information about the newest lawsuit which has been filed against Dick Cheney ,the Congress, and Nancy Pelosi regarding their role in the fraud. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=8762
In my heart, I honestly believe that our national leaders are so corrupt at the core levels of government, that even this lawsuit will fall on deaf ears and we will continue on our path to trampling the constitution. I wish it were not so, but there are very powerful forces at work to see that this man stays in office regardless of the number of laws violated to keep him in office.
Once upon a time, a righteous man asked almighty God if he would spare his judgement on a wicked city called Sodom if he could find just ten righteous men. Apparently there were not even ten righteous men in that vile city and so God destroyed the city and its inhabitants. What we need in America right now is just one righteous judge; just one that would have the common respect for our Constitution to just consider one lawsuit- saying "Mr. Obama, please show us just one piece of proof that you are constiutionally qualified to serve as our President"?
h'mm
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Geert Wilders to be tried for committing "Hate Crime" for producing the movie "Fitna"
Geert Wilders is my hero. He has taken a bold stance against the bloody totalitarian military ideology/religion of Islam. I have followed Geert for some time now in my own "jihad" - so to speak - against this bloody 7th century religion. I had not paid attention lately to his own persecution for his production of the movie "Fitna" until my wife sent me an email about him yesterday. I thought the Netherlands had decided to leave him alone, but I forgot how evil pressure from Islamic leaders can persist.
Well, speak about interesting timing- the Dutch courts ( Wednesday January 21, 2009) have now decided to prosecute Geert Wilders for committing a "hate crime" for his production of the movie "Fitna". It is a sad day in the world, a sad day in Europe, and a very sad day when the Dutch - a people historically known for "tolerance" have stooped to the point of allowing Muslims to so dominate their culture and legal system that they would cave in and agree to send Mr. Wilders to prison- for what? Mr. Wilders committed the "crime" of producing a short 17 minute documentary film about the "real" Islam.
I can tell you from personal experience, from having travelled from South America- namely Guyana where Islam is taking complete control of the country, (and has devastated that country to its ruin), to the frontiers of Pakistan and Afghanistan, and throughout Africa and Europe that this man speaks the truth in this short film. I only wish I had been the one to produce this film. He shows quoted verses from the Quran throughout the short video clip regarding the Muslim teaching of "jihad".
I find it interesting that every verse he cites in the movie is one of the verses I have highlighted in my Quran at home which I proudly show anyone who expresses interest. Since my arrest in Pakistan, for committing a crime against Alla, I have decided to become my own expert at understanding their military manual on how they conduct global war -"The Quran" . And mark my words, this book is a military manual. It will show you how to conduct war, how to terrorize a people, when and whom to mame, and the methods to use in your brutal attacks.
I have studied war all my life since I was a young man. I am fascinated with war manuals, with military history, and military strategy. I consider myself to be somewhat knowledgeable about how to use military tactics in various life applications. If you study up on war, then read the Quran several times, you will learn as I have- that Geert Wilders is telling the "whole" truth when he warns us that our global way of life may be gone as we know it within two generations if we do not all unite, stand together and fight against the globalization of Islam.
Help Geert Wilders by contacting the media, and whichever outlet you choose to spread the word about the crime that the Dutch committed yesterday when they called for the criminal prosecution of Geert Wilders for committing a hate crime against Islam.
Here is the link where the courts just decided to prosecute our friend- Geert Wilders.
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/01/21/wilders-fitna-prosecute.html
Here is a link to his short video on Youtube- You- REALLY need to see this short video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAzEs-Vmyfc
By the way- you should watch it while you can until it is removed from Youtube. This has been banned in many countries throughout the world. Even in Britain- liveleak.com had to pull this movie from their site fearing the saftey of their employees. With the new "administration" here in America- this will likely fall under the category of "hate crime" as well.
Carpe Diem
Well, speak about interesting timing- the Dutch courts ( Wednesday January 21, 2009) have now decided to prosecute Geert Wilders for committing a "hate crime" for his production of the movie "Fitna". It is a sad day in the world, a sad day in Europe, and a very sad day when the Dutch - a people historically known for "tolerance" have stooped to the point of allowing Muslims to so dominate their culture and legal system that they would cave in and agree to send Mr. Wilders to prison- for what? Mr. Wilders committed the "crime" of producing a short 17 minute documentary film about the "real" Islam.
I can tell you from personal experience, from having travelled from South America- namely Guyana where Islam is taking complete control of the country, (and has devastated that country to its ruin), to the frontiers of Pakistan and Afghanistan, and throughout Africa and Europe that this man speaks the truth in this short film. I only wish I had been the one to produce this film. He shows quoted verses from the Quran throughout the short video clip regarding the Muslim teaching of "jihad".
I find it interesting that every verse he cites in the movie is one of the verses I have highlighted in my Quran at home which I proudly show anyone who expresses interest. Since my arrest in Pakistan, for committing a crime against Alla, I have decided to become my own expert at understanding their military manual on how they conduct global war -"The Quran" . And mark my words, this book is a military manual. It will show you how to conduct war, how to terrorize a people, when and whom to mame, and the methods to use in your brutal attacks.
I have studied war all my life since I was a young man. I am fascinated with war manuals, with military history, and military strategy. I consider myself to be somewhat knowledgeable about how to use military tactics in various life applications. If you study up on war, then read the Quran several times, you will learn as I have- that Geert Wilders is telling the "whole" truth when he warns us that our global way of life may be gone as we know it within two generations if we do not all unite, stand together and fight against the globalization of Islam.
Help Geert Wilders by contacting the media, and whichever outlet you choose to spread the word about the crime that the Dutch committed yesterday when they called for the criminal prosecution of Geert Wilders for committing a hate crime against Islam.
Here is the link where the courts just decided to prosecute our friend- Geert Wilders.
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/01/21/wilders-fitna-prosecute.html
Here is a link to his short video on Youtube- You- REALLY need to see this short video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAzEs-Vmyfc
By the way- you should watch it while you can until it is removed from Youtube. This has been banned in many countries throughout the world. Even in Britain- liveleak.com had to pull this movie from their site fearing the saftey of their employees. With the new "administration" here in America- this will likely fall under the category of "hate crime" as well.
Carpe Diem
Obama's First Executive Order? What was it? None other than confidentiality of Presidential records!
I must say as I watched the inauguration ceremony of Barack Obama, I was looking forward to no more blogging on -and - on about this issue of qualification. I was prepared- as I blogged earlier to submit to the authorities over me -as a Christian. However, something in my mind kept nagging at me wondering just what might be the subject of his very first Executive Order.
I kept pondering in my mind- what would I do first if I was elected President and knew my legal team and I had just spent close to a million dollars guarding my birth certificate and keeping my records from seeing the light of day? What if I knew deep down- that I really was not Constitutionally qualified to serve as President and had to seal anything that might expose the truth? Oh- I know- I would pass an Executive Order immediately making it an immediate matter of national security that anything I wanted to keep from public view, I could just protect it with a magical Executive Order.
Well surprise surprise- what was Obama's very first Executive Order- issued in less than 24 hours from when he took the oath of office?
Yep- You got it- here it is- his VERY FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS:
(January 21, 2009)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ExecutiveOrderPresidentialRecords/
I kept pondering in my mind- what would I do first if I was elected President and knew my legal team and I had just spent close to a million dollars guarding my birth certificate and keeping my records from seeing the light of day? What if I knew deep down- that I really was not Constitutionally qualified to serve as President and had to seal anything that might expose the truth? Oh- I know- I would pass an Executive Order immediately making it an immediate matter of national security that anything I wanted to keep from public view, I could just protect it with a magical Executive Order.
Well surprise surprise- what was Obama's very first Executive Order- issued in less than 24 hours from when he took the oath of office?
Yep- You got it- here it is- his VERY FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS:
(January 21, 2009)
Executive Order -- Presidential Records
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish policies and procedures governing the assertion of executive privilege by incumbent and former Presidents in connection with the release of Presidential records by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) pursuant to the Presidential Records Act of 1978, it is hereby ordered as follows:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ExecutiveOrderPresidentialRecords/
Well I have to congratulate President Obama- he is already doing a superb job of covering those tracks!
Carpe Diem
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
President Bush's last - Executive Order Re-investigating individuals in Positions of Public Trust
This is from the Cache of Gary Eubanks PC. Within minutes of Obama's inauguration, it was purged from the whitehouse website although it was news that was only 3 days old.
I am not being critical of the new administration- they just chose to delete it.
Executive Order: Granting Reciprocity on Excepted Service and Federal Contractor Employee Fitness and Reinvestigating Individuals in Positions of Public Trust
Section 1. Policy. (a) When agencies determine the fitness of individuals to perform work as employees in the excepted service or as contractor employees, prior favorable fitness or suitability determinations should be granted reciprocal recognition, to the extent practicable.
(b) It is necessary to reinvestigate individuals in positions of public trust in order to ensure that they remain suitable for continued employment.
Sec. 2. Definitions. For the purposes of this order:
(a) "Agency" means an executive agency as defined in section 105 of title 5, United States Code, but does not include the Government Accountability Office.
(b) "Contractor employee" means an individual who performs work for or on behalf of any agency under a contract and who, in order to perform the work specified under the contract, will require access to space, information, information technology systems, staff, or other assets of the Federal Government. Such contracts, include, but are not limited to:
(i) personal services contracts;
(ii) contracts between any non-Federal entity and any agency; and
(iii) sub-contracts between any non-Federal entity and another non-Federal entity to perform work related to the primary contract with the agency.
(c) "Excepted service" has the meaning provided in section 2103 of title 5, United States Code, but does not include those positions in any element of the intelligence community as defined in the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, to the extent they are not otherwise subject to Office of Personnel Management appointing authorities.
(d) "Fitness" is the level of character and conduct determined necessary for an individual to perform work for or on behalf of a Federal agency as an employee in the excepted service (other than a position subject to suitability) or as a contractor employee.
(e) "Fitness determination" means a decision by an agency that an individual has or does not have the required level of character and conduct necessary to perform work for or on behalf of a Federal agency as an employee in the excepted service (other than a position subject to suitability) or as a contractor employee. A favorable fitness determination is not a decision to appoint or contract with an individual.
(f) "Position of Public Trust" has the meaning provided in 5 CFR Part 731.
(g) "Suitability" has the meaning and coverage provided in 5 CFR Part 731.
Sec. 3. Agency Authority to Set Fitness Criteria and Determine Equivalency. The authority to establish criteria for making fitness determinations remains within the discretion of the agency head. Agency heads also have the discretion to determine whether their criteria are equivalent to suitability standards established by the Office of Personnel Management. Agency heads shall take into account Office of Personnel Management guidance when exercising this discretion.
Sec. 4. Reciprocal Recognition of Fitness and Suitability Determinations. (a) Except as provided by subsection (b) of this section, agencies making fitness determinations shall grant reciprocal recognition to a prior favorable fitness or suitability determination when:
(i) the gaining agency uses criteria for making fitness determinations equivalent to suitability standards established by the Office of Personnel Management;
(ii) the prior favorable fitness or suitability determination was based on criteria equivalent to suitability standards established by the Office of Personnel Management; and
(iii) the individual has had no break in employment since the favorable determination was made.
(b) Exceptions to Reciprocal Recognition. A gaining agency is not required to grant reciprocal recognition to a prior favorable fitness or suitability determination when:
(i) the new position requires a higher level of investigation than previously conducted for that individual;
(ii) an agency obtains new information that calls into question the individual's fitness based on character or conduct; or
(iii) the individual's investigative record shows conduct that is incompatible with the core duties of the new position.
Sec. 5. Reinvestigation of Individuals in Positions of Public Trust. Individuals in positions of public trust shall be subject to reinvestigation under standards (including but not limited to the frequency of such reinvestigation) as determined by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, to ensure their suitability for continued employment.
Sec. 6. Responsibilities. (a) An agency shall report to the Office of Personnel Management the nature and results of the background investigation and fitness determination (or later changes to that determination) made on an individual, to the extent consistent with law.
(b) The Director of the Office of Personnel Management is delegated authority to implement this order, including the authority to issue regulations and guidance governing suitability, or guidance related to fitness, as the Director determines appropriate.
Sec. 7. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budget, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order shall not suspend, impede, or otherwise affect Executive Order 10450 of April 27, 1953, as amended, or Executive Order 13467 of June 30, 2008;
(d) This order is intended only to improve the internal management of the executive branch and is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers, employees or agents, or any other person.
Sec. 8. Effective Date and Applicability. This order is effective upon issuance and is applicable to individuals newly appointed to excepted service positions or hired as contractor employees beginning 90 days from the effective date of this order.
GEORGE W. BUSH
THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 16, 2009.
Monday, January 19, 2009
George Bush issues very strange Executive Order three days before leaving office which may pave the way to help bring down Obama
With just 3 days remaining in George Bush's Presidency, he has issued a sweeping Presidential Executive Order which just may help those of us who have been trying to spread the word to have Barack Obama, aka Barack Obama II, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama removed from office. It is indeed quite unusual for a President to issue such a sweeping directive with just seventy two hours remaining as President. And yet, this Executive Order just might be instrumental in exposing President Elect Obama and might assist in criminal prosecution against him and others as well. I am not saying that is why the directive was issued- but this directive has already been instrumental in a Federal Lawsuit having been filed on January 19th, one day before the Inaugurual event.
The link to the Presidential Executive Order- direct from the White House is: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2009/01/20090116-1.html
The best link covering the lawsuit that was just filed today- and the full text of the suit filed by Dr. Orly Taitz is :http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=2965
I must admit, with all the controversy about the mystery surrounding Obama's "natural born citizen" status, I find it fascinating that such a sweeping Presidential Executive Order would be issued that might be used against Obama. I must admit I did not think George Bush had any fight left in him, but if this in any way will expose the truth behind this President Elect- then so be it.
By the way, I would like to thank the person behind http://americamustknow.com
for doing the research that saved me a great deal of trouble. There has been alot of bantering on many discussion groups about our definition of a "natural born citizen" vs just a citizen, a native born citizen or a naturalized citizen. The framers of our Constitution knew quite well what was considered a "natural born citizen" as opposed to just a native born citizen or even a citizen.
Emmerich de Vattel authored a famous publication in 1758 (just about 20 years before our Constitution) entitled "The Laws of Nations". This publication had a profound impact on the our Founding Fathers. Vattel had a full section regarding the issue and description of the term "natural born citizen" in his book. Obviously our founding fathers would have been quite familiar with this understanding which is why they inserted this requirement in Article II of our Constitution. Outside of the general context of why our founders would have cared, and short of their understanding and use of the term "natural born citizen" we might be confused as to the real meaning of the term "natural born citizen."
Allow me to quote a section of Vattel's 1758 publication "The Law of Nations" and Vattel's definition and explanation of "natural born citizen" - again with acknowledgement to my friend at "http://americamustknow.com"
"The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."
The founders knew- a natural born citizen had to be born on U.S. soil by U.S. citizens. Obama "may" (we have no proof) have been born on U.S. soil- but his father was a British Citizen - and his mother was not old enough to confer citizenship- Obama is NOT a natural born citizen! He was born subject to the British Crown- the exact scenario the founders of our Constitution shed blood to keep from happening! Just imagine, who would have thought that two hundred years after these men fought the British to free us from British rule and then having put clearly in our Constitution- NO Brit's can be elected President- or for that matter - no one who is born with dual citizenship, that we would elect a President that was born a son of a British citizen? It is a sickening kind of irony.
This should be the final word on the chapter. It is a matter of hours before a Usurper is to be Inaugurated President- while there are numerous lawsuits requesting that this be delayed until this man can prove he is a natural born citizen.
Our leaders, judges and elected officials have betrayed our Country. May God have mercy on us as we usher in a new era of lawlessness at the highest levels in the land.
The link to the Presidential Executive Order- direct from the White House is: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2009/01/20090116-1.html
The best link covering the lawsuit that was just filed today- and the full text of the suit filed by Dr. Orly Taitz is :http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=2965
I must admit, with all the controversy about the mystery surrounding Obama's "natural born citizen" status, I find it fascinating that such a sweeping Presidential Executive Order would be issued that might be used against Obama. I must admit I did not think George Bush had any fight left in him, but if this in any way will expose the truth behind this President Elect- then so be it.
By the way, I would like to thank the person behind http://americamustknow.com
for doing the research that saved me a great deal of trouble. There has been alot of bantering on many discussion groups about our definition of a "natural born citizen" vs just a citizen, a native born citizen or a naturalized citizen. The framers of our Constitution knew quite well what was considered a "natural born citizen" as opposed to just a native born citizen or even a citizen.
Emmerich de Vattel authored a famous publication in 1758 (just about 20 years before our Constitution) entitled "The Laws of Nations". This publication had a profound impact on the our Founding Fathers. Vattel had a full section regarding the issue and description of the term "natural born citizen" in his book. Obviously our founding fathers would have been quite familiar with this understanding which is why they inserted this requirement in Article II of our Constitution. Outside of the general context of why our founders would have cared, and short of their understanding and use of the term "natural born citizen" we might be confused as to the real meaning of the term "natural born citizen."
Allow me to quote a section of Vattel's 1758 publication "The Law of Nations" and Vattel's definition and explanation of "natural born citizen" - again with acknowledgement to my friend at "http://americamustknow.com"
"The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."
The founders knew- a natural born citizen had to be born on U.S. soil by U.S. citizens. Obama "may" (we have no proof) have been born on U.S. soil- but his father was a British Citizen - and his mother was not old enough to confer citizenship- Obama is NOT a natural born citizen! He was born subject to the British Crown- the exact scenario the founders of our Constitution shed blood to keep from happening! Just imagine, who would have thought that two hundred years after these men fought the British to free us from British rule and then having put clearly in our Constitution- NO Brit's can be elected President- or for that matter - no one who is born with dual citizenship, that we would elect a President that was born a son of a British citizen? It is a sickening kind of irony.
This should be the final word on the chapter. It is a matter of hours before a Usurper is to be Inaugurated President- while there are numerous lawsuits requesting that this be delayed until this man can prove he is a natural born citizen.
Our leaders, judges and elected officials have betrayed our Country. May God have mercy on us as we usher in a new era of lawlessness at the highest levels in the land.
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Two Supreme Court cases still pending before the court challenging Obama qualifications to serve as POTUS -news blackouts increase
On January 12th, the Supreme Court denied another challenge to the qualifications of Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro. (www.obamacrimes.com) This denial was not a major setback, but another serious setback in the many cases which have been presented to the State and Federal Courts and U.S. Supreme Court under complete nationwide news blackout. According to Dr. Orly Taitz, (http://www.drorly.blogspot.com) the attorney representing Lightfoot in Lightfoot vs Bowen, (Supreme Court Docket number is 08A524) she is counting now 31 lower court lawsuits which have been filed -all challenging Obama's qualifications to serve as POTUS.
To date- not one judge, not one court has considered one single lawsuit even to the Supreme Court regarding the actual merits of their case- that Barack is either an illegal immigrant one the one hand, or not a natural born citizen (father -Kenyan-British citizen) on the other hand. So here we are - just seven days away from a Presidential Inauguration where every Court in the land has refused to even have a look at this candidate's birth certificate or consider the Constitutionality of his Presidency. The next day we will see the Justices have a real look at this mess will be January 16th. If that case does not move forward quickly, the next one at the Supreme Court by Orly Taitz will be looked at 3 days after this illegal candidate has been inaugurated.
So far, my earlier prediction stands- even the Supreme Court would turn its back on the Country and our Constitution in favor of "mob rule". We are about to inaugurate a man to be President that has provided NO proof whatsoever that he is a "natural born citizen" in direct contradiction to Article II of our founding Constitution!.
Our Political parties let us down, they did not check the credentials of this candidate. Our Secretaries of State have let us down. Our Electors let us down. Our Senators and Congressmen have let us down. Our Judges have let us down. Now even our Supreme Court- the guardian of our Constitution- has let us down. We have Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court John Roberts who is going to "Swear In" Barack Hussein Obama as President- to swear an oath to faithfully defend the Constitution of the United States- while he is blatantly violating Article II of the Constitution by standing before the American people to take office. (No wonder why there is a suit before the Supreme Court demanding that the Justices recuse themselves from participating in this charade of an inauguration - ((Supreme Court DocketNo. 08A524) SUGGESTION OF RECUSAL OF HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS AND HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES FROM SWEARING OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AS THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ON JANUARY 20TH DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH THE FULL COURT CONFERENCE HEARING ON HE 23RD OF JANUARY OF LIGHTFOOT V BOWEN, SEEKING TO FIND BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA NOT ELIGIBLE FOR PRESIDENCY... Petioner(s) Lightfoot, et. al. respectfully suggest that Honorable Chief Justice Roberts and Honorable Associate Justices of the Supreme Court recuse themselves from the swearing of Barack Hussein Obama as the president of the United States on January 20, 2009 due to conflict of interest.) copied from www.drorly.blogspot.com
So, fellow Americans here we stand- disunited as a nation 7 days from a fraudulent inauguration, with very little hope of our defenders of the Constitution to do little more than bat an eye at a fraud (born with a Kenyan father) being elected 45th President of the "United States". The media has done their job alright. They have followed their agenda to a tee. They have cheated America out of their own belief in a freedom of the Press.
We must pray for our justices do the right thing. We have no other human hope remaining than for our judges at this late hour to do the right thing.
<
To date- not one judge, not one court has considered one single lawsuit even to the Supreme Court regarding the actual merits of their case- that Barack is either an illegal immigrant one the one hand, or not a natural born citizen (father -Kenyan-British citizen) on the other hand. So here we are - just seven days away from a Presidential Inauguration where every Court in the land has refused to even have a look at this candidate's birth certificate or consider the Constitutionality of his Presidency. The next day we will see the Justices have a real look at this mess will be January 16th. If that case does not move forward quickly, the next one at the Supreme Court by Orly Taitz will be looked at 3 days after this illegal candidate has been inaugurated.
So far, my earlier prediction stands- even the Supreme Court would turn its back on the Country and our Constitution in favor of "mob rule". We are about to inaugurate a man to be President that has provided NO proof whatsoever that he is a "natural born citizen" in direct contradiction to Article II of our founding Constitution!.
Our Political parties let us down, they did not check the credentials of this candidate. Our Secretaries of State have let us down. Our Electors let us down. Our Senators and Congressmen have let us down. Our Judges have let us down. Now even our Supreme Court- the guardian of our Constitution- has let us down. We have Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court John Roberts who is going to "Swear In" Barack Hussein Obama as President- to swear an oath to faithfully defend the Constitution of the United States- while he is blatantly violating Article II of the Constitution by standing before the American people to take office. (No wonder why there is a suit before the Supreme Court demanding that the Justices recuse themselves from participating in this charade of an inauguration - ((Supreme Court DocketNo. 08A524) SUGGESTION OF RECUSAL OF HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS AND HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES FROM SWEARING OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AS THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ON JANUARY 20TH DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH THE FULL COURT CONFERENCE HEARING ON HE 23RD OF JANUARY OF LIGHTFOOT V BOWEN, SEEKING TO FIND BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA NOT ELIGIBLE FOR PRESIDENCY... Petioner(s) Lightfoot, et. al. respectfully suggest that Honorable Chief Justice Roberts and Honorable Associate Justices of the Supreme Court recuse themselves from the swearing of Barack Hussein Obama as the president of the United States on January 20, 2009 due to conflict of interest.) copied from www.drorly.blogspot.com
So, fellow Americans here we stand- disunited as a nation 7 days from a fraudulent inauguration, with very little hope of our defenders of the Constitution to do little more than bat an eye at a fraud (born with a Kenyan father) being elected 45th President of the "United States". The media has done their job alright. They have followed their agenda to a tee. They have cheated America out of their own belief in a freedom of the Press.
We must pray for our justices do the right thing. We have no other human hope remaining than for our judges at this late hour to do the right thing.
<
Saturday, January 10, 2009
WorldNetDaily Has excellent video about Obama's Presidential qualifications you must see! My blogs shift soon
I am normally a very outgoing optimistic Christian businessman that is excited about the future of where Christianity is changing lives and how God has allowed Christians to launch many great global missions and humanitarian opportunities from the United States. I began blogging recently because the mainstream media was deceiving Americans about a serious issue facing this country during the 2008 election. The deception was their cover up of the qualifications of Barack Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Soetoro, aka Barry Obama..
As I mentioned in many of my blogs, I have nothing personal against Mr. Obama or whoever he is. I am just one that digs down to the facts and I have discovered the truth about this illegal candidate and have tried to get others to do their own research, contact their Electors, Congressional Representatives and Senators to beg them to look into the qualifications issue. Now that the Electoral College has in fact elected this illegal candidate and he is headed for an inauguration on January 20th, I will only post about this until the Courts finish weighing in on this issue. After that, I want to begin blogging on the positive things about life and where I as an American and a Christian can move forward in life to help change the world by spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
For the next few weeks however, I feel compelled to help (even if it only affects a few people) spread the word that America has made a very significant mistake, but it can at least "right" part of this "wrong" by spreading the word and to help raise money for the 3 or 4 Supreme Court cases pending before the courts and the 17 or so cases at the State and Federal Court level. Many of these attorneys and groups need money to fight these cases.
My hat is off to Mr. Michael Savage the only national radio talk show host with enough courage to tackle this issue. All other MSM radio personalities and news outlets have successfully been muzzled, even the ones that brag that they have the courage to tackle tough issues.
There has been a very professional short video prepared that we hoped would be aired on national television, but no airtime could be bought for this to air during MSM newscasts (as I have been told- I did not research this). The Mainstream media has not only "blacked" this out, they have even refused to let people purchase airtime to show this video. This is a travesty in America, to know that we have lost a fair and balanced media. Even the station that has a similar motto has now had a huge portion of their ownership purchased by Saudi Oil money, so they have now been muzzled as well.
WordNetDaily (www.wnd.com) has really tried to spread the word. Please take a moment and go to this link below, and watch this very short video about President Elect Obama. It will be well worth your time.
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=85587
Remember though, regardless of how bleak the future may seem, we are to pray for our leaders, for kings and for those in authority. We must pray for our President Elect. We must be diligent to pray for the future of this great country and for our continued freedoms and for our freedom to spread the word about the greatest gift given to mankind- the possibility of personal salvation through Jesus Christ. - John 3:16
As I mentioned in many of my blogs, I have nothing personal against Mr. Obama or whoever he is. I am just one that digs down to the facts and I have discovered the truth about this illegal candidate and have tried to get others to do their own research, contact their Electors, Congressional Representatives and Senators to beg them to look into the qualifications issue. Now that the Electoral College has in fact elected this illegal candidate and he is headed for an inauguration on January 20th, I will only post about this until the Courts finish weighing in on this issue. After that, I want to begin blogging on the positive things about life and where I as an American and a Christian can move forward in life to help change the world by spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
For the next few weeks however, I feel compelled to help (even if it only affects a few people) spread the word that America has made a very significant mistake, but it can at least "right" part of this "wrong" by spreading the word and to help raise money for the 3 or 4 Supreme Court cases pending before the courts and the 17 or so cases at the State and Federal Court level. Many of these attorneys and groups need money to fight these cases.
My hat is off to Mr. Michael Savage the only national radio talk show host with enough courage to tackle this issue. All other MSM radio personalities and news outlets have successfully been muzzled, even the ones that brag that they have the courage to tackle tough issues.
There has been a very professional short video prepared that we hoped would be aired on national television, but no airtime could be bought for this to air during MSM newscasts (as I have been told- I did not research this). The Mainstream media has not only "blacked" this out, they have even refused to let people purchase airtime to show this video. This is a travesty in America, to know that we have lost a fair and balanced media. Even the station that has a similar motto has now had a huge portion of their ownership purchased by Saudi Oil money, so they have now been muzzled as well.
WordNetDaily (www.wnd.com) has really tried to spread the word. Please take a moment and go to this link below, and watch this very short video about President Elect Obama. It will be well worth your time.
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=85587
Remember though, regardless of how bleak the future may seem, we are to pray for our leaders, for kings and for those in authority. We must pray for our President Elect. We must be diligent to pray for the future of this great country and for our continued freedoms and for our freedom to spread the word about the greatest gift given to mankind- the possibility of personal salvation through Jesus Christ. - John 3:16
Friday, January 09, 2009
Liar, Fraud, Cheat, Fraudster, Deceiver? Not my words- but Pravda has a few strong words!
Well, the President of the Senate called for the Electoral College vote yesterday morning- January 8th. Many of you may have been horrified to see it on C-Span. Did Dick Cheney give anyone a chance to "challenge" the vote before he cast the final vote yesterday? Nope. I wonder why? For the sake of brevity, I would defer you to an article today to cause you to think about what has just happened in our country due to this historic Presidential Race.
The Russians sure have the courage to tell it like it is: here you go- hold on:
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/106914-0/
This may enlighten you to some of what I have been trying to get across to any of my readers for the last several months. I would pretty much say that I agree with -oh- maybe - just maybe- ah- 100% of what is mentioned in this article. It actually seems to reflect some of my views I have held for many months.
Fasten your seatbelts, it is going to be a very rough ride from here on out any way the game unfolds now. The Supreme Court is considering case after case- which of course the media - owned quite largely by Saudi Oil money- is not allowing anyone in the MSM to disclose the truth.
Wow, we are in for a ride.
The Russians sure have the courage to tell it like it is: here you go- hold on:
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/106914-0/
This may enlighten you to some of what I have been trying to get across to any of my readers for the last several months. I would pretty much say that I agree with -oh- maybe - just maybe- ah- 100% of what is mentioned in this article. It actually seems to reflect some of my views I have held for many months.
Fasten your seatbelts, it is going to be a very rough ride from here on out any way the game unfolds now. The Supreme Court is considering case after case- which of course the media - owned quite largely by Saudi Oil money- is not allowing anyone in the MSM to disclose the truth.
Wow, we are in for a ride.
Thursday, January 08, 2009
Obama can never be a "natural born citizen" unless someone changes the Constitution
In April 2008, Barack Obama co-sponsored a Senate Resolution (Resolution 511) to affirm John McCain's qualification to serve as President if elected. The summary statements of the Resolution make two emphatic determinations. 1- Whereas John McCain was born to two U.S. Citizens and 2- Whereas John McCain was born on an American Military Base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936 ... be it resolved that John McCain is a "natural born citizen".
Here is the interesting twist, historically, since the discussions of our founding fathers all the way to John Bingham, author of the 14th Amendment (after the civil war- clarifying birth rights). John Bingham believed that a natural born citizen is a born of two U.S. parents on U.S. soil. Obama may have been born on U.S. soil, but he his father was a British Citizen. According to British Law - even to this day- Barack Obama was born a British Citizen, not a U.S. Citizen since he was born a subject of the British Crown. It is just like if I visit a foreign country and my wife gives birth while we are visiting in that country. My son would be a U.S. citizen since his mom and dad are U.S. citizens. Now, there could be debate over whether my son could run for President, because he was born on foreign soil, and could be also subject to foreign powers.
Obama could not be a "natural born citizen" because since he was born a British citizen by virtue of his father's British Nationality, he would be born as a divided subject. He would be subject to the Crown since he was born subject to the law of his father's country- by virtue of the bloodline.. Since he was born a British citizen and thus had dual civic loyalties to two countries he could never ever be a natural born citizen of the United States. At some point in his life, he would have to go through a legal process to remove his British Heritage, but since this is not "natural" and something else would have to be done in his life for him to only be a U.S. citizen, then he is not natural born.. We have some who might say he could be born a "citizen" since he was born on U.S. soil, but he could never run for President, he would not be "natural born".
Remember, our Constitutional Fathers were very wise in their approach to this office. They wanted someone born American born to Americans- this way he was loyal to one country and one country only, and would never be divided regarding his citizenship. Barack Obama- (if he was even born in the U.S. which many believe he can never ever prove he was born here) is not a true natural born citizen. His own father was not a citizen, his teenage mother was not old enough to confer citizenship on him. He does not "think" American- he was not educated here in this country for many years of his life. He was educated as a citizen of Indonesia as a young man.
Obama is very likely not even a naturalized citizen, much less a citizen, and certainly never can be natural born.
I suppose that is why he has spent a million dollars fighting to keep the American people from seeing his real birth certificate. Imagine that whole story, it sounds so unreal.
We will see if the court will weigh in on this.
Here is the interesting twist, historically, since the discussions of our founding fathers all the way to John Bingham, author of the 14th Amendment (after the civil war- clarifying birth rights). John Bingham believed that a natural born citizen is a born of two U.S. parents on U.S. soil. Obama may have been born on U.S. soil, but he his father was a British Citizen. According to British Law - even to this day- Barack Obama was born a British Citizen, not a U.S. Citizen since he was born a subject of the British Crown. It is just like if I visit a foreign country and my wife gives birth while we are visiting in that country. My son would be a U.S. citizen since his mom and dad are U.S. citizens. Now, there could be debate over whether my son could run for President, because he was born on foreign soil, and could be also subject to foreign powers.
Obama could not be a "natural born citizen" because since he was born a British citizen by virtue of his father's British Nationality, he would be born as a divided subject. He would be subject to the Crown since he was born subject to the law of his father's country- by virtue of the bloodline.. Since he was born a British citizen and thus had dual civic loyalties to two countries he could never ever be a natural born citizen of the United States. At some point in his life, he would have to go through a legal process to remove his British Heritage, but since this is not "natural" and something else would have to be done in his life for him to only be a U.S. citizen, then he is not natural born.. We have some who might say he could be born a "citizen" since he was born on U.S. soil, but he could never run for President, he would not be "natural born".
Remember, our Constitutional Fathers were very wise in their approach to this office. They wanted someone born American born to Americans- this way he was loyal to one country and one country only, and would never be divided regarding his citizenship. Barack Obama- (if he was even born in the U.S. which many believe he can never ever prove he was born here) is not a true natural born citizen. His own father was not a citizen, his teenage mother was not old enough to confer citizenship on him. He does not "think" American- he was not educated here in this country for many years of his life. He was educated as a citizen of Indonesia as a young man.
Obama is very likely not even a naturalized citizen, much less a citizen, and certainly never can be natural born.
I suppose that is why he has spent a million dollars fighting to keep the American people from seeing his real birth certificate. Imagine that whole story, it sounds so unreal.
We will see if the court will weigh in on this.
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
Constitutional Crisis Still looms over Presidency
Here we are on January 7th, just one day before the Electoral College Votes are tallied by the President of the Senate and we are REALLY in the middle of an explosive Constitutional Crisis over the qualifications of our Presumed President Elect. Wow! We have the (Electoral College- actually the vote tally) vote set for January 8th, and the Supreme Court is going into full conference again on January 9th, to reconsider this whole birth certificate nonsense again!
Some legal experts believe the Supreme Court might not weigh in on this until after January 8th, when our Presumed President Elect actually becomes legally the President Elect. From January 8th to January 20th, is when he is legally the President Elect and now the courts are heating up on this one. There are countless lawsuits in the Federal Courts, and 2 are still alive in the Supreme Court with other suits maybe headed toward the SCOTUS.
Why all the fuss? Because every sane minded -historically and politically astute person I know is acutely aware of the fact that this man who has been elected by the popular vote is not Constitutionally qualified to serve as President!
I have held off now for another week commenting on this while I did more research on this subject and I kid you not, it is overwhelming digging into the life of Barack Obama or whoever he is The mainstream media has treated him like the Manchurian Candidate, they have blocked paid advertisers from being able to spread the truth about this fraudulent candidate, the mainstream media has further brainwashed millions of Americans that there is no controversy and that this issue is a hoax and Internet rumor.
I have to be very careful just blogging about this whole issue because if I throw too much information out there, even anyone reading my blog might think that I am a radical conspiracy nut.
Ok - so where are we now on January 7? I will toss out a few statements that are all very serious issues on their own merit, and at the end of this blog you will see an open letter to the Deputy Attorney General that was written by Andy Martin- a true American Hero. My hat is off to all these attorneys that have fought the good fight to expose the truth about our candidate.
Just some of the issues before the American public that the mainstream media is keeping under wraps.
1. The Obama birth certificate issue- of Obama fighting vigorously in court to prevent anyone from seeing his birth certificate.
2. Many (I mis-spoke earlier and wrongly said "all") Constitutional experts agree that even if he was born in Hawaii- he was clearly born a British Citizen since his father was a British Citizen and at the time of Obama's birth, his teenage mother was not old enough to confer U.S. Citizenship on Barry. Barry was naturally born a citizen of Great Britain to a British citizen- if he was even born on U.S. soil as he claims.
3. No court has ruled on this matter to date- anywhere or anytime
4. No court or legal authority EVER one time looked into his qualifications to even run for President
5. The Democratic National Committee did NOT certify his qualifications for Presidency
6. No State Agency has ever made a declaration that Barry is a natural born citizen
7. The Senate held a hearing to discover if John McCain was Constitutionally qualified to serve as President since he was born in the Panama Canal zone. Both his parents were U.S. citizens and Panama was a U.S. territory at the time of McCain's birth and consequently the Senate hearings concluded he was a "natural born citizen" and qualified to run for President.
8. NO such hearing was held- much less considered for Obama- I wonder why?
9. There is now according to Debbie Schlessel evidence of a fraudulent filing just in 2008 for Barry's selective Service Registration. There are petitions being sent to the Justice Department calling for an investigation. See Debbie's article at: http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html
10.. Barry does not own the home he claimed he owns in Chicago. It is owned by the attorney representing the convicted felon Tony Retzo.
11. The word "President Elect" is mentioned 44 times in the indictment recently issued to the governor of Illinois.
There is alot more- but for the sake of brevity we will stop here for today.
Pray for our Senators on that on January 8th, at least one Senator will have the courage to challenge the legitimacy of the Electoral College Vote. This one challenge by just one Senator could alter the course of American history.
Below is a copy of a letter that has been sent to the Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii by Andy Martin who had requested a copy of the birth certificate of Barack Obama, or Barry Soetoro, or Barry Obama or whoever he is- we really don't know.
I borrowed this from: http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?page_id=1518
January 6, 2009
Some legal experts believe the Supreme Court might not weigh in on this until after January 8th, when our Presumed President Elect actually becomes legally the President Elect. From January 8th to January 20th, is when he is legally the President Elect and now the courts are heating up on this one. There are countless lawsuits in the Federal Courts, and 2 are still alive in the Supreme Court with other suits maybe headed toward the SCOTUS.
Why all the fuss? Because every sane minded -historically and politically astute person I know is acutely aware of the fact that this man who has been elected by the popular vote is not Constitutionally qualified to serve as President!
I have held off now for another week commenting on this while I did more research on this subject and I kid you not, it is overwhelming digging into the life of Barack Obama or whoever he is The mainstream media has treated him like the Manchurian Candidate, they have blocked paid advertisers from being able to spread the truth about this fraudulent candidate, the mainstream media has further brainwashed millions of Americans that there is no controversy and that this issue is a hoax and Internet rumor.
I have to be very careful just blogging about this whole issue because if I throw too much information out there, even anyone reading my blog might think that I am a radical conspiracy nut.
Ok - so where are we now on January 7? I will toss out a few statements that are all very serious issues on their own merit, and at the end of this blog you will see an open letter to the Deputy Attorney General that was written by Andy Martin- a true American Hero. My hat is off to all these attorneys that have fought the good fight to expose the truth about our candidate.
Just some of the issues before the American public that the mainstream media is keeping under wraps.
1. The Obama birth certificate issue- of Obama fighting vigorously in court to prevent anyone from seeing his birth certificate.
2. Many (I mis-spoke earlier and wrongly said "all") Constitutional experts agree that even if he was born in Hawaii- he was clearly born a British Citizen since his father was a British Citizen and at the time of Obama's birth, his teenage mother was not old enough to confer U.S. Citizenship on Barry. Barry was naturally born a citizen of Great Britain to a British citizen- if he was even born on U.S. soil as he claims.
3. No court has ruled on this matter to date- anywhere or anytime
4. No court or legal authority EVER one time looked into his qualifications to even run for President
5. The Democratic National Committee did NOT certify his qualifications for Presidency
6. No State Agency has ever made a declaration that Barry is a natural born citizen
7. The Senate held a hearing to discover if John McCain was Constitutionally qualified to serve as President since he was born in the Panama Canal zone. Both his parents were U.S. citizens and Panama was a U.S. territory at the time of McCain's birth and consequently the Senate hearings concluded he was a "natural born citizen" and qualified to run for President.
8. NO such hearing was held- much less considered for Obama- I wonder why?
9. There is now according to Debbie Schlessel evidence of a fraudulent filing just in 2008 for Barry's selective Service Registration. There are petitions being sent to the Justice Department calling for an investigation. See Debbie's article at: http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html
10.. Barry does not own the home he claimed he owns in Chicago. It is owned by the attorney representing the convicted felon Tony Retzo.
11. The word "President Elect" is mentioned 44 times in the indictment recently issued to the governor of Illinois.
There is alot more- but for the sake of brevity we will stop here for today.
Pray for our Senators on that on January 8th, at least one Senator will have the courage to challenge the legitimacy of the Electoral College Vote. This one challenge by just one Senator could alter the course of American history.
Below is a copy of a letter that has been sent to the Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii by Andy Martin who had requested a copy of the birth certificate of Barack Obama, or Barry Soetoro, or Barry Obama or whoever he is- we really don't know.
I borrowed this from: http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?page_id=1518
January 6, 2009
Jill T. Nagamine
Deputy Attorney General
425 Queen Street
Honolulu, HI96813
via fax (808) 587-3077
with copy to:
Hon. Bert I. Ayabe
Circuit Court
777 Punchbowl Street
Honolulu, HI96813-5093
via fax (808) 539-4108
Re:
Martin v. Lingle
Circuit Court No. 08-1-2147-10-BIA
Dear Attorney Nagamine:
This will respond to your cover letter and proposed order of today’s date.
I am getting the creepy feeling that the Hawai’i courts are operated as a secret society. You sent me a proposed ruling on my motion for reconsideration, and I have not even been advised the motion has been addressed and ruled on. How do you know what is going on before I do? The motion to reconsider was unopposed by your office. It should have been granted as an unopposed motion. Now there is some form of communication between your office and the judge, to which I am not a party. Not a party indeed.
Judicial proceedings should not only be fair and impartial; they should appear to be fair and impartial. The proceedings involving manipulation of Hawai’i’s official records do not even remotely pass the smell test. The entire nation has been horrified by the abusive treatment I have received in Hawai’i.
Your proposed order makes the false claim that I neglected to sign my motion for reconsideration. I did no such thing. I signed it.
Furthermore, I do not even know at this point who the opposing lawyer is: you or the judge. Even if through some oversight there was an unsigned motion, that oversight was waived by your lack of a response or lack of any opposition. That is how a local lawyer’s oversight would be treated. I am receiving invidiously discriminatory treatment.
The judge seems to be acting and lead counsel in the cover-up of Obama’s birth certificate and raising issues that you have failed to raise or waived. In other words, the judge is not acting as a judge; he is acting as an “activist seeking combat” and trying to act proactively to feed you objections. That is not the proper role of a judicial officer. Therefore, your unsupported claim that I failed to sign my motion is both an outrageous accusation and apparent evidence of judicial bias against an out-of-state litigant.
I find the treatment afforded me as a respected writer seeking access to a historic document as bearing the obvious taint of corruption and conspiracy. I do not feel I have even remotely been afforded a neutral forum.
I am going to prepare a new motion for rehearing and ask that the judge be recused for bias and that the matter be reheard by a new judge. The issue of the cover-up of official documents by apparently corrupt and conspiratorial judges and lawyers, and other local officials in Hawai’i, is not going to go away, not today, not next week, not ever. Justice must not only be served, justice must appear to be served.
When a judge says he is protecting the “privacy” rights of the president-elect of the United States, who has waived any privacy by posting a facsimile of the document on the Internet, the judge is making a joke of the judicial function and trivializing a good faith effort to invoke Hawai’i law.
The suspicious behavior of Hawai’i officials is doing incalculable damage to the administration of Barry Obama. The election eve “verification” that a secret document existed was a bald-faced political act by a supposedly impartial professional official. Do you think we are all stupid on the mainland?
We need to know who this man is. His birth certificate from 1961 obviously contains hidden horrors. Otherwise, why should there be such resistance to public access for a historic document?
I am going to fight this corruption and abuse of the judicial system in Hawai’i.
I began fighting judicial corruption in Illinois over forty years ago as a young law student; it looks like I will now have to add a new state to my list of crooked judicial systems, Hawai’i.
Respectfully submitted,
ANDY MARTIN
AM:sp
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
